ANALISIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN JIGSAW DALAM MENGATASI KESULITAN BELAJAR MEMBACA SISWA SDN 5 LIMBOTO KABUPATEN GORONTALO
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis model pembelajaran Jigsaw dalam mengatasi kesulitan belajar membaca pada siswa di SDN 5 Limboto, Kabupaten Gorontalo. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Tempat pelaksanaan penelitian dilakukan di SDN 5 Limboto, Kabupaten Gorontalo, dengan subjek penelitian yaitu guru dan siswa yang terlibat dalam proses pembelajaran membaca menggunakan model Jigsaw. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan meliputi observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data dilakukan melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam penerapan model pembelajaran Jigsaw terdapat beberapa kesulitan belajar membaca siswa, seperti kurang lancar dalam membaca teks, sulit membedakan huruf, tidak ada pembiasaan belajar membaca dirumah, kesalahan dalam pengucapan kata, serta rendahnya pemahaman terhadap isi bacaan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran Jigsaw di SDN 5 Limboto Kabupaten Gorontalo masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan yang perlu ditangani melalui pelatihan guru, peningkatan keaktifan dan kerja sama siswa, serta optimalisasi strategi pembelajaran. Diharapkan hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi masukan bagi pihak sekolah dalam mengembangkan dan menerapkan model pembelajaran Jigsaw sebagai upaya mengatasi kesulitan belajar membaca pada siswa sekolah dasar.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Al Otaiba, S., McMaster, K., Wanzek, J., & Zaru, M. W. (2023). What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.458
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mante-Estacio, Ma. J. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies and its relationship with Filipino high school students’ reading proficiency: insights from the PISA 2018 data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 400. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01886-6
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Cochon Drouet, O., Lentillon-Kaestner, V., & Margas, N. (2023). Effects of the Jigsaw method on student educational outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1216437
Hall, C., Dahl‐Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty Years of Reading Intervention Research for Elementary Students with or at Risk for Dyslexia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.477
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
Mawikere, M. C. S. (2022). Model-Model Pembelajaran. EDULEAD: Journal of Christian Education and Leadership, 3(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.47530/edulead.v3i1.91
Miles, M. B. ., Huberman, A. M. ., & Saldaña, Johnny. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Nalls, A. J., & Wickerd, G. (2023). The Jigsaw Method: Reviving a Powerful Positive Intervention. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 39(3), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2022.2124570
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nurani, R. Z., Nugraha, F., & Mahendra, H. H. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Membaca Permulaan Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1462–1470. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i3.907
Putri, D. E., & Pratiwi, S. (2025). Enhancing Collaboration and Learning Outcomes through the Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model among Elementary School Students. JED (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi), 10(2), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.26618/jed.v10i2.18122
Roseth, C. J., Lee, Y., & Saltarelli, W. A. (2019). Reconsidering jigsaw social psychology: Longitudinal effects on social interdependence, sociocognitive conflict regulation, motivation, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000257
Rosmayasari, R. (2021). STUDENTS LEARNING PROBLEMS IN EARLY READING AND WRITING AT GRADE 1 OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Dinamika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 13(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.30595/dinamika.v13i2.9321
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative Learning and Academic Achievement: Why Does Groupwork Work?. [Aprendizaje cooperativo y rendimiento académico: ¿por qué funciona el trabajo en grupo?]. Anales de Psicología, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
Stanczak, A., Darnon, C., Robert, A., Demolliens, M., Sanrey, C., Bressoux, P., Huguet, P., Buchs, C., & Butera, F. (2022). Do jigsaw classrooms improve learning outcomes? Five experiments and an internal meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(6), 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000730
Stevens, E. A., Walker, M. A., & Vaughn, S. (2017). The Effects of Reading Fluency Interventions on the Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension Performance of Elementary Students With Learning Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Research from 2001 to 2014. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(5), 576–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416638028