PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) BERBANTUAN MEDIA INTERAKTIF TERHADAP MOTIVASI DAN HASIL BELAJAR MENULIS SISWA KELAS V SEKOLAH DASAR
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) berbantuan media interaktif terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar menulis siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain quasi experiment tipe One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 24 siswa kelas V SD Swasta Al Washliyah 2 P UNIVA yang ditentukan dengan teknik total sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui angket motivasi belajar dan tes hasil belajar menulis. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dan inferensial menggunakan uji normalitas Liliefors dan uji paired sample t-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa motivasi belajar siswa meningkat dari rata-rata 40,75 dalam kategori sedang menjadi 52,87 dalam kategori tinggi. Hasil belajar menulis juga mengalami peningkatan dari rata-rata pretest 70,04 menjadi rata-rata posttest 86,54, dengan selisih 16,50. Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa nilai thitung hasil belajar sebesar 41,27 dan thitung motivasi belajar sebesar 60,65, keduanya lebih besar daripada ttabel 2,069 pada taraf signifikansi 0,05. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan model STAD berbantuan media interaktif memberikan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar menulis siswa. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD berbantuan media interaktif efektif digunakan untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar menulis siswa sekolah dasar. Model ini dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu alternatif strategi pembelajaran inovatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, khususnya pada materi menulis karangan dan cerita pendek.
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Alves-Wold, A., Walgermo, B. R., McTigue, E., & Uppstad, P. H. (2024). The ABCs of writing motivation: A systematic review of factors emerging from K–5 students’ self-reports as influencing their motivation to write. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1396484. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1396484
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel – A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Liu, Y., Ma, S., & Chen, Y. (2024). The impacts of learning motivation, emotional engagement and psychological capital on academic performance in a blended learning university course. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1357936. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1357936
Lo, K. W. K., Ngai, G., Chan, S. C. F., & Kwan, K.-p. (2022). How students’ motivation and learning experience affect their service-learning outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 825902. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.825902
McBreen, M., & Savage, R. (2021). The impact of motivational reading instruction on the reading achievement and motivation of students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1125–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09584-4
OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
OECD. (2022). Education at a glance 2022: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Permzadian, V., & Shen, T. (2024). Assessing the predictive validity of expectancy theory for academic performance. BMC Psychology, 12, 437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01935-y
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Slavin, R. E. (2020). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Törmänen, T., Ketonen, E., Lehtoaho, E., Turunen, M., Zabolotna, K., Shubina, T., & Järvenoja, H. (2025). Situational motivation in academic learning: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10036-0
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a post-COVID world: Nine ideas for public action. UNESCO.
Wang, Y., et al. (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of self-determination-theory-based interventions in the education context. The Journal of Psychology.
World Bank, UNICEF, FCDO, USAID, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, & UNESCO. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank.