ANALYZING ECOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS OF MARINE ORGANISMS FOR LOCAL ENVIRONMENT-BASED ANIMAL ECOLOGY LEARNING
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
Animal ecology learning in biology education remains predominantly theoretical and often overlooks the potential of local environments as authentic learning resources. Addressing this gap, the present study analyzes the ecological relationships among marine biota based on field observations and explores their potential to support context based animal ecology learning. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach complemented by quantitative data. Data were collected through field observations using the belt transect method across three observation lines in the coastal area of Beurawang, Sabang. The data were analyzed descriptively to identify marine biota, examine their ecological roles, and relate these findings to key concepts in animal ecology learning. In addition, Spearman correlation analysis was applied to examine relationships among species. The findings identified five dominant marine biota groups, namely sea stars (Linckia laevigata), sea urchins (Echinoidea), nudibranchs (Nudibranchia), coral reefs (Anthozoa), and giant clams (Tridacna sp.), each contributing differently to the coastal ecosystem. The correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations among several species, with coral reefs acting as a central component that strongly influences the presence of other organisms. This indicates that coral habitat structure plays a crucial role in shaping the distribution and stability of benthic communities. Importantly, the study highlights that field based ecological data offers strong potential as meaningful learning resources. The empirical findings can be integrated into instructional practices to support the teaching of ecological concepts such as species interactions, trophic relationships, adaptation, and ecosystem balance in a more contextual and relevant manner. This study therefore contributes to bridging the gap between ecological field research and biology education by promoting the use of local environmental contexts in learning.
Rincian Artikel

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Referensi
Adriadi, A., Ihsan, M., Wulandari, T., Suprayogi, D., & Rayani, N. (2024). Analisis keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa pada mata kuliah biologi lingkungan prodi biologi fakultas sains dan teknologi. Bio-Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.31849/bl.v11i1.19310
Aldyza, N., Barus, T. A., Mulya, M. B., & Sarong, M. A. 2022a. Coral resilience inside and outside of Pesisir Timur Pulau Weh conservation zone, Sabang City, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 23(11), 5744–5751. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d231126
Aldyza, N., Barus, T. A., Mulya, M. B., Sarong, M. A., Afkar, A., Andi, F., et al. 2022b. Coral covers and the abundance of Chaetodontidae in Suaka Alam Perairan of Weh Island, Aceh. Biodjati, 7(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.15575/biodjati.v7i1.17604
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W., & Gaillard, E. (2020). Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review. Biological Conservation, 241, 108224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108224
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E. W., Stier, A. C., & Silliman, B. R. (2019). The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 89(2), e01340. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1
Begon, M., Townsend, C. R., & Harper, J. L. (2020). Ecology: From individuals to ecosystems (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Bissinger, K., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Environmental literacy in practice: Education on ecological systems. Sustainability, 10(12), 4654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9978-9
Brandl, S. J., Rasher, D. B., Côté, I. M., Casey, J. M., Darling, E. S., Lefcheck, J. S., & Duffy, J. E. (2019). Coral reef ecosystem functioning: Eight core processes and the role of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 17(8), 445–454.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2088
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2022). Learning biology outdoors: Effects on students’ understanding. Journal of Biological Education, 56(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2011.647432.
English, S., Wilkinson, C., & Baker, V. (1997). Survey manual for tropical marine resources (2nd ed.). ASEAN-Australia Marine Science Project.
Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Graham, N.A.J., Nash, K.L. The importance of structural complexity in coral reef ecosystems. Coral Reefs 32, 315–326 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-012-0984-y.
Hill, J., & Wilkinson, C. (2004). Methods for ecological monitoring of coral reefs. Australian Institute of Marine Science.
Klau, F. R., Subagiyo, S., & Riniatsih, I. (2025). Bioekologi bulu babi (Echinoidea) pada ekosistem padang lamun di Kecamatan Kupang Barat. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 28(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkt.v28i2.25627
Menge BA, Cerny-Chipman EB, Johnson A, Sullivan J, Gravem S, et al. (2016) Correction: Sea Star Wasting Disease in the Keystone Predator Pisaster ochraceus in Oregon: Insights into Differential Population Impacts, Recovery, Predation Rate, and Temperature Effects from Long-Term Research. PLOS ONE 11(6): e0157302. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157302